viernes, 20 de enero de 2012

Megaupload, Sopa, Pipa, SeriesYonkis...

Megaupload is a web page that allows keep files online to share with others.
Yesterday was definetly closed by FBI arguing copyright defence.

Anonymus has replied by attacking USA justice web page (www.justice.gov), and universal music web page.

This difficult relation between law and internet has been increased during the last weeks because of the redaction of two new laws: SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect Intellectually Property Act).

Despite this law will only affect to films or music, it also can ban facebook profiles because of linking a copyright video. Wikipedia is also against this law, because it can affect the free knowledge.

Meanwhile, in Spain, the creators of Series Yonkis (first spanish company on free video and streaming) have sold their part on the company... They suppouse that they will be the next.

6 comentarios:

  1. Shame!!!
    Shame!!!!
    Meanwhile, we had to pay fees whe we buy a CD, Video, Laptop ....... Mr. Teddy Bautista, (Mr he isn't Mr.) ripped off to SGAE and all Spanish people whe we paid the fee or tax. SHAME... JAIL!!!!!
    Before we had the possibility of downloading films ... and now we will not be able to do it. SHAME!!!!! No words.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. 1/ Megaupload could be used unlawfully, but also in a positive way (as Box.net is used in the Main Blog)... What about the non-copyright material that belongs to someone and has been unprotected?.

    2/Megaupload creator is a wealthy and haughty fat man that increased his fortune by selling copyrighted material. But what about YouTube, that take adventage of free videos made by users to get paid by advertising. Youtube practices a similar business, the point is users has refused their right on the video... If big companies deny refusing their rights, users will not accept losing their owns rights uploading photo/video in Youtube/Facebook...

    3/ Bearing in mind that Teddy Bautista paid 300.000 Euros to Urdangarin, could Urdangarin be considered a modern Robin Hood for stealing from the thief?

    ResponderEliminar
  3. 1/ I am for these kind of websites where you can dowload free material. If you can do it is because someone likes sharing it with you. If you can do it do it. We live ( or I suppose we live) in a free live.
    2/ If you upload some particular video on youtube, is because you want to share with people. Why not use it? Sometimes is very useful to teach people something using all these tools that internet offers us.
    2/ About Teddy Bautista I don't want to express my opinion. I am against the copyright only for the owners. In the end the owners haven't got received any money from SGAE because they have been ripped off by the Great Teddy Bautista. LOL when Mrs Sinde wanted to create a new law agains piracy. About Urdangarin a Shame! no words. He should give us a great example giving back all the money that he stolen us coz with these money could be used to solve some dramatical situations of the People in our country. Our economy would be very thanked.
    All Companies have to work to survive, all people who work doing films, videos etc ... should think about the new way of obtaining profits of their works. Everybody has to survive. Why these people are protected?
    Do you understand me Terrible?
    More work and less profits.!!!!!

    ResponderEliminar
  4. I think both think the same! but I we expressing our own ideas of different way. But, please Urdangarin isn't the new Robbin Hood. I wish he had been the new Robbin Hood, surely our King would be proud of him. And all Spanish people too, but sadly the reality is different.

    ResponderEliminar
  5. Of course, we are thinking the same... But, would be King proud of Robin Hood (in the forest of Sherwood, I don't wanto you think in anybody?... A King would be proud of a robber? Or a King would be proud of a robber who steal for others??

    ;)

    ResponderEliminar
    Respuestas
    1. Any King would be proud of any robber, but in this case, "the robber" is his daughter's husband, so he must life with his company!!!!!! If our king had ............

      Eliminar